Movies have long been our most important
popular cultural artifact—the unifying element between people, the thing that
we can most readily point to as representing our shared taste. Bringing up a
line or a scene connects us instantly to another person, and someone without
any such points of reference will be at a significant remove from us.
Still, despite the obvious importance of
movies, there is something oddly dismissible about them. Try to think about the
most important, formative, touchstone movies of the past twenty years or so—what
comes to mind? The Departed? The Dark Knight? Pulp Fiction? None of these shed
real light on who or what we are, and none of them remain with us in a
meaningful way. The recent film Gravity has
captured the public mind in a more dramatic way than any film in recent memory,
and it is interesting to look at it deeply as a way to find out what exactly it
is we get from movies.
Gravity is a remarkably simple story, sort of like The Old Man and the Sea in space (and with a rather hot woman instead of than an old man, obviously). It is purely a depiction of the various and maddeningly minor tasks necessary to secure basic existence in an unforgivingly harsh climate. It is a straightforward representation of how the human spirit can triumph against forbidding odds and circumstances. A fire extinguisher is perhaps the central plot device in the film.
Gravity is a remarkably simple story, sort of like The Old Man and the Sea in space (and with a rather hot woman instead of than an old man, obviously). It is purely a depiction of the various and maddeningly minor tasks necessary to secure basic existence in an unforgivingly harsh climate. It is a straightforward representation of how the human spirit can triumph against forbidding odds and circumstances. A fire extinguisher is perhaps the central plot device in the film.
This is all to say that there may not be
even a single real idea in the film—it is the ideal of self-evidence, of there
being nothing under the surface, beyond the easy metaphor of transplanting
Sandra Bullock’s atmospheric struggle onto terra firma. The fact that it has
been hailed as a “near perfect movie” by critics is telling—movies aren’t
really supposed to have ideas in them. The ideal movie can be totally devoid of
ideas.
So what then does a movie do? It
communicates physical reality in a heightened, distilled way. And this is supposed
to be the most important means of transferring cultural information. It is a
natural extension of the importance of realism in all art—presenting ourselves
with a more controlled and stylized version of ourselves, prizing fidelity to
sensation and experience over intellective accomplishment. It is a surefire
path toward sociocultural stasis at best, and general narcissism at worst.
No comments:
Post a Comment